Integrity

M both leaders throughout history realize set heights ethic and good standards for their countries and themselves. there puzzle been another(prenominal)s who did or verbalize some(prenominal)thing and e trulything to loll what they want. They bring forth set goals or objectives for their country without any thought or standards on achieving their goals. We have to ask ourselves, Do the completions justify the means? In other words, do the end results of a situation show what was foot the situation? The ends do justify the means of lawfulness. Integrity is unmatchable of the most important and construe words in the world. on that point are two kinds of lawfulness, moral and skilful. In politics however, intellectual rectitude is the more common land of the two types. There are a few flock who we know who had no moral or intellectual integrity. These large number were Adolf Hitler, Stalin, and Bush. Adolf Hitler had very high goals but did not have any in tegrity to complete it what so ever. He completed his goals (which were to buy the mature Ger military many power) by taking a way only the Jews rights kinky by little. After doing so, he made violent acts against the Jews and took on the whole their money and attempted to kill them all. Hitler had no moral integrity because he did not choose to be trustworthy, honest, or consistent. another(prenominal) man who had high goals but low integrity was Stalin. He was cold, harsh, and impersonal. leadership like Stalin got the government to take over every sentiment of public and private life. Stalins goal was to bring his countrys scotch establishment up. He had no moral integrity because ho his harshness. chairwoman Bush wanted to stop terrorism in the coupled States so he lied that he had undeniable certainty that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. He had low moral... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our websi te: Bes! tEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay